Legal Opinion
Hanlan v. Parkchester North Condominium, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 28, 2006PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dianne T. Renwick, J.), entered August 5, 2005, which granted defendant Parkchester North Condominium’s motion and defendant Citibank’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Defendants having established, prima facie, their entitlement to summary judgment, it was incumbent on plaintiffs to come forward with evidence establishing a material issue of fact requiring a trial (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]). Plaintiffs failed to meet that burden. Neither Citibank, the mortgagor of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Chapman v. SilberNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Gibbs v. Port AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by3 opinions
- Flores v. Cathedral Properties LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Flores v. Cathedral Properties LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Yaniveth R. v. LTD Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014