Legal Opinion

Wright v. Ridgely

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1910PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Cabell County. Action by Tbomas S. Wright against John F. Ridgely. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.-

1Opinion of the Court

POEEENBARGER, JUDGE :

On a declaration in trespass on the case, drawn as one for malicious prosecution, Thomas S. Wright recovered a judgment for $500.00 against John E. Ridgely in the circuit court of Cabell county, of which the latter complains.

As the declaration fails to aver, in any form, that the defendant maliciously did the acts complained of, the demurrer should have been sustained. Malice and lack of probable cause are the *320most important elements in such an action. Waldron v. Sperry, 53 W. Va. 116; Harper v. Harper, 49 W. Va. 661; Tavenner v. Morehead, 41 W. Va. 116; Jones v. Finch,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kay v. Glade Creek & R. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Jones v. FinchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887
  3. Harper v. HarperWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Tavenner v. MoreheadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Waldron v. SperryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BraggWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Ritz v. KingdonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Ritz v. KingdonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Walters v. Appalachian Power Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. State v. BraggWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API