In the Interest of H.N.T.

OPINION

Opinion by Justice O’NEILL.

Mother challenges the trial court’s April 4, 2011 order, in which it granted Father’s amended motion to modify the parent child relationship. In a single issue, Mother argues the trial court abused its discretion by imposing a geographic restriction that essentially modified conservatorship and permitted Father to designate the primary residence of H.N.T. We reverse the trial court’s decision and render judgment setting aside its April 4, 2011 order.

Background

It is undisputed H.N.T. was born of the marriage between Mother and Father in 1998.1 When they…