Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Hearn Brothers, Inc.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided August 12, 1965No. 104, 1964PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAREY, Justice:

Plaintiff-below seeks reversal of a judgment of the Superior Court based upon a jury verdict.

Hearn Brothers, Inc. (Hearn) operates a supermarket in Wilmington. C & L, Inc. (C & L) is a wholesaler whose warehouse adjoins the supermarket. It is customary, whenever Hearn gives C&L an order for groceries, for an employee of the latter to make delivery by borrowing a grocery cart from Hearn. On the day plaintiff was injured, he was a customer in the supermarket. He was injured by either stepping against, or being struck by, a grocery cart used by Albert Carucci, an employee of C & L…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barmore v. Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Railway Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1904
  2. International Carbonic Engineering Co. v. Natural Carbonic Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1944
  3. United States v. LemonsDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1954
  4. Tyndall v. RipponSuperior Court of Delaware · 1948
  5. Fahey v. NilesSuperior Court of Delaware · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martin v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1976
  2. Handy v. Uniroyal, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1971
  3. Dillon v. General Motors CorporationSuperior Court of Delaware · 1974
  4. Beattie v. BeattieSuperior Court of Delaware · 2001
  5. Martin v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API