General Motors Corp. v. Sanchez
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gonzales
The principal question in this case is when does the doctrine of comparative responsibility apply in a products-liability case. Relying on its reading of our decision in Keen v. Ashot Ashkelon, Ltd., 1 the court of appeals held that the decedent’s responsibility for the accident that resulted in his death should not be compared with the manufacturer’s responsibility because the decedent’s actions merely amounted to the failure to discover or guard against a product defect. 2 We conclude that: (1) comparative responsibility applies in strict liability if a plaintiffs negligence is something…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Continental Coffee Products Co. v. CazarezTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. CryeTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by217 opinions
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Lee Lewis Construction, Inc. v. HarrisonTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Torrington Co. v. StutzmanTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- St. Joseph Hospital v. WolffTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Texas Department of Transportation v. AbleTexas Supreme Court · 2000
212 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.