Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Burnett v. Grattan

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 27, 1984No. 83-264Published

1Concurring in the judgmentJustice Powell

The question is what is the appropriate statute of limitations applicable to this Maryland employment discrimination case under 42 U. S. C. §§ 1981, 1983, and 1985(3). The Court of Appeals in McNutt v. Duke Precision Dental Orthodontic Laboratories, Inc., 698 F. 2d 676 (CA4 1983), and again in this case, held that in all claims for which no other limitations period is specifically provided, Maryland’s general 3-year period of limitations is the most appropriate for federal courts to apply in actions under the Reconstruction Civil Rights Acts. The Court of Appeals rejected petitioners’…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McNutt v. Duke Precision Dental & Orthodontic Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API