Legal Opinion
Redwine v. Dorman, Banking Commissioner
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided April 20, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Drury, Commissioner
Affirming.
The banking commissioner recovered the following judgments against J. R. Blake, $500; J. S. Redwine, $5,500; Elbert Hargis, $3,700; J. P. Crain, $2,000; and A. H. Hargis, $38,000 from which the defendants have appealed.
These judgments were recovered upon a 100 per cent, assessment made upon these defendants as owners of the capital stock of 'the Hargis Bank & Trust Company, and we shall state and dispose of the grounds for reversal as we reach them.
Jurisdiction of Defendants.
Defendants contend these judgments were taken against them without…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Converse v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Howarth v. LombardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Selig v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Milner v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Reddick v. United States Building & Loan Association's AssigneeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bridges v. Wilhoit, Banking & Securities Com'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
- Taylor v. Dorman, State Banking and SEC. Com'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939