Legal Opinion · Dissent

Harewood v. Leclaire

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 23, 2007Published

1Dissent

Green and Pine, JJ. (dissenting).

We respectfully dissent because, in our view, the determination that petitioner violated the inmate rules at issue is not supported by substantial evidence (see generally People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 NY2d 130, 139 [1985]). According to the misbehavior report, petitioner was released from his cell to go to his job at the mess hall, but he was not present in the mess hall area when an inmate count was conducted. At the tier II hearing, petitioner testified that, after he was released from his cell, he asked a correction officer whether the law library officer…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Vega v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Reyes v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Montgomery v. KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API