Legal Opinion

Witmer v. Warfel

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County

Decided October 13, 1902No. 19Published

Justices — Jurisdiction—Dower Interest — Certiorari. No. 19, September Term, 1902, C. P. of Lancaster Co.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Landis, J.,

It seems to be agreed between the parties to this suit, and properly so, that the writ of certiorari having been sued out more than twenty days after the rendition of the judgment by the Justice, no objections can now be raised to his proceedings except such as go to his jurisdiction, and this, therefore, is the only question which merits our consideration.

On February 11, 1902, suit was begun by Barbara Wit-mer against E. C. Warfel, before S. E. Wanner, a Justice of the Peace. The transcript shows that the plaintiff’s claim was for “two years’ dower interest overdue,”…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pidcock ex rel. Closson v. ByeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1831
  2. De Haven v. BartholomewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  3. Unangst v. KraemerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1845
  4. Shelly v. ShellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1844
  5. Diefenderfer v. EshlemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API