Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ex Parte McJunkins

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 17, 1997No. 72410Published

1DissentOverstreet, Judge

I dissent to the majority’s determination that a defendant, in accordance with a plea agreement, can waive the statutory requirement that sentences run concurrently when imposed in a single prosecution arising from a single criminal episode.

The majority opinion overrules that portion of Ex parte Sims, 868 S.W.2d 803, 804 (Tex.Cr.App.1993) which held that the operation of V.T.C.A. Penal Code, § 3.03 creates an absolute restriction of a trial court’s general authority to impose consecutive sentences. And interestingly, the State’s untimely Motion for Rehearing, which was not filed until months…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Marin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. LaPorte v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Heath v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Ex Parte McJunkinsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API