Legal Opinion
Deneke v. Menard, Inc.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided June 22, 2022No. 5:21-cv-05068Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION LEROY DENEKE, 5:21-CV-05068-LLP Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL AND FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER vs. [Docket No. 7] AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MENARD, INC., CROSS MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER, TO COMPEL, AND TO Defendant. QUASH RULE 30(b)(6) NOTICE [Docket No. 15] INTRODUCTION This matter is pending before the court on plaintiff LeRoy Deneke’s motion to compel defendant’s corporate designee deposition under Federal Rule of Civil…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Gaylon Hofer v. Mack Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Sanchez v. City of Santa AnaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Alfonso J. Cervantes v. Time, Inc., and Denny WalshCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.