Legal Opinion

Keel, Adm'r. v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 5, 1922No. 11059PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

The plaintiff’s intestate, J. O. Walker, Jr., received personal injuries resulting in his death several hours thereafter in a collision between the automobile in which he was riding and a freight train of the defendant at a public street crossing in the Town of Estill.

The administrator first brought an action under Lord Campbell’s Act, which resulted in a verdict for the defendant. Upon appeal the judgment was affirmed by this Court. 108 S. C., 390; 95 S. E., 64.

Thereafter the administrator brought this action under what is known as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sandel v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
  2. Lane v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  3. Peeples v. Seaboard Air Line RailwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
  4. Keel v. Seaboard Air Line RailwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Florida · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Crosby v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  2. Spence v. American Oil Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  3. Woody v. South Carolina Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
  4. Tobias v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  5. Truett v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API