In re Robert A.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency (see Matter of David H., 69 NY2d 792, 793 [1987]; Matter of Charles S., 41 AD3d 484, 485 [2007]), we find that it was legally sufficient to support the finding that the appellant recklessly engaged in conduct that created a substantial risk of serious injury and which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of reckless endangerment in the second degree (see Penal Law § 120.20; Matter of Kadeem W., 5 NY3d 864, 865 [2005]; Matter of George V., 231 AD2d 641, 642 [1996]; Matter of James D., 231 AD2d 631…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. MateoNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Matter of H.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In re Hasan C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re Brooklyn B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re Aaron P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re Clarissa S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Matter of Kobe S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.