Legal Opinion

Nims v. Ford

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 20, 1893PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLathrop, J.

The Berkshire Life Insurance Company, summoned as trustee of the principal defendant, in 1861, in consideration of a premium of forty dollars paid to it by Julia O. Ford, and of the annual premium of a like sum to be paid to it on or before a certain day in every year during the continuance of the policy, assured the life of said Julia, in the amount of one thousand dollars, for the term of life, “ for the benefit of her husband,” who is the principal defendant in this case. The policy contains the following clause: “ And the said company do hereby promise and agree well and truly to pay or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Campbell v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  2. Maine Fire & Marine Insurance v. WeeksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1811
  3. Dean v. American Legion of HonorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  4. Bailey v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. Massachusetts National Bank v. BullockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Boyden v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. Wright v. Vermont Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  3. McCarthy v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  4. Peters v. Snavely-AshtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  5. Cross v. Brown, Steese & ClarkeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API