Legal Opinion

Haigler v. Fischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 22, 2014Published

1Opinion of the Court

Although the disciplinary hearing under review was not “completed within 14 days following the writing of the misbehavior report” (7 NYCRR 251-5.1 [b]), the record supports the conclusion that any delay in this regard had appropriately been “authorized by the commissioner or his designee” (7 NYCRR 251-5.1 [b]). In any event, the provisions of this rule are directory rather than mandatory (see e.g. Matter of Edwards v Fischer, 87 AD3d 1328, 1329 [2011]; Matter of Rodriguez v Fischer, 76 AD3d 1131, 1132 [2010]; Matter of Rosario v Selsky, 37 AD3d 921, 921-922 [2007]). Therefore, in the absence…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Edwards v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Sanders v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Crosby v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Rosario v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Hicks v. ScullyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API