Legal Opinion

State v. Klesko

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 7, 2014No. 13-1391PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GENOVESE, Judge.

kin this criminal case, Defendant, William C. Klesko, appeals the order of restitution pursuant to sentencing on his plea to the charge of theft of over $1,500.00. For the following reasons, we affirm Defendant’s sentence in all respects.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

When Defendant entered his plea, the State made the following recitation of facts in support of his plea:

[B]ack on August the 1st, 2011, this defendant did with intent — without consent and with intent to deprive via through [sic] fraudulent acts, conduct, representations, did take money [the] State contends [was]…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. ReynoldsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. State v. MetlinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. State v. WilliamsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. State v. JosephLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. State v. McDonaldLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. DurhamLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API