Myones v. Cohen
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted that part of the motion of plaintiffs for leave to amend their bill of particulars (cf., Scarangello v State of New York, 111 AD2d 798). Defendants will not be prejudiced by the court’s granting plaintiffs’ motion because the proposed supplemental bill of particulars merely amplifies the allegations in the original bill of particulars with respect to the physical injuries sustained by Andrew Myones (plaintiff) as a result of the accident (see, Scarangello v State of New York, supra, at 799).
We further conclude…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Loomis v. Civetta Corinno Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Scarangello v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Robbins v. SperlazzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Maddox v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982