Jo Levitt v. Merck & Company
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1DissentColloton, Circuit Judge
I conclude that the district court correctly applied Missouri law in ruling that Jo Levitt's claim against Merck & Company was barred by the statute of limitations. I would therefore affirm the judgment.
Missouri applies an "inquiry notice" standard to begin the running of a statute of limitations. Powel v. Chaminade Coll. Preparatory, Inc. , 197 S.W.3d 576 , 583 (Mo. 2006). There is no requirement that the plaintiff have actual knowledge of her injury and its cause. Wheeler v. Eftink , 507 S.W.3d 598 , 604 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016). A cause of action accrues when the "evidence was such to place a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Nat Levy v. Donald J. Ohl, William J. Knapp, L. David Green, and Merilyn HamlettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Miller v. Redwood Toxicology Laboratory, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- The Washington Post v. Honorable Deborah RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- Powel v. Chaminade College Preparatory, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2006
- Ranney v. Parawax Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.