Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Buckner
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
(after stating the facts as above). The instructions given by the court to the jury are expressed in proper terms of law, and no fault can be found in them. This conclusion eliminates from the consideration of the case many of the questions sought to be raised by the assignments of error.
The main question presented in the appeal is that of whether or not the mental disturbance caused to .the appellee by the appellant, such as the evidence shows, can be held to be an element of the damages resulting from the breach of contract, for which a recovery is allowable under the law. According to' the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rowell v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1889
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. EdmondsonTexas Supreme Court · 1897
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. GiffinTexas Supreme Court · 1900
- Johnson v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Morrison v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.