Legal Opinion

Heath v. Bates

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 15, 1881PublishedCited by 13 opinions

CrviL action for the recovery of fees due the plaintiff as an officer for the service of writs placed in his hands for service by the defendant, an attorney-at-law; brought originally before a justice of the peace, and by the defendant -appealed to the Court of Common Pleas, and in that court tried to the jury before Sail, J. Verdict for the plaintiff and motion for a new trial by the defendant. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtPark, C. J.

The plaintiff, a deputy sheriff, sued the defendant, an attorney at law, for fees due him for the service of writs placed in his hands for service by the defendant. The plaintiff claimed that the placing of the writs in his hands for service, constituting a request that he should serve them, raised an implied contract on the part of the defendant to pay his fees for the service. The defendant claimed that in such a ease there was no implied agreement to pay the fees, but that, as he was an attorney, acting for his clients, and they were known to the plaintiff, the clients only were liable to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Adams v. HopkinsNew York Supreme Court · 1810

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Burt v. GahanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
  2. Theuerkauf v. SuttonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Judd & Detweiler, Inc. v. GittingsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1915
  4. C. C. Plumb Mixes, Inc. v. StoneSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
  5. Smart Document Solutions, LLC v. MillerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API