Legal Opinion

Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co. v. Central Union Stock Yards Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 3, 1913PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On error to tlie Hudson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Garrison, J.

In this case the action is brought by a paving company to recover from the defendant the balance of the price of certain work executed under a contract between them. The work consisted in the paving of the defendant’s stock yard. The defences were that the certificate of the defendant’s engineer was not obtained as required by the contract, that it was not waived, and that the work was not substantially performed by the plaintiff or accepted by the defendant. With respect to the engineer’s certificate the contract contained these…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Horandt v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. B. FERNANDEZ & HNOS., S. EN C. v. Rickert Rice Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
  2. Central Union Stock Yards Co. v. Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1913
  3. Dickinson v. Erie RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
  4. Palestroni v. JacobsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API