Legal Opinion

(PS) Alcala v. Murphy

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 17, 2019No. 2:19-cv-00969Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JESSE ALCALA, et al., CASE NO: 2:19-cv-00969-KJM-CKD (PS) 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER 14 THERESA MURPHY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Before the court are two motions. Plaintiffs’ first motion requests counsel be appointed to 18 represent them in this civil matter. (ECF No. 10.) 19 Any successful application for appointment of counsel must comply with criteria set forth 20 in Bradshaw v. Zoological Society of San Diego,

662 F.2d 1301

(9th Cir. 1981). Before 21 appointing counsel to plaintiff, the court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  2. Nancy S. Bradshaw, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. Zoological Society of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API