Legal Opinion

Mitchum v. Shaw

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 15, 1914No. 8875PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Before Spain, J., Bamberg, March, 1913. Action by Henry Mitchum against Emma R. Shaw, Minerva K-inard, Henry Chassereau, Willie Chiassereau, G. B. Clayton and J. E. Connelly. From decree for plaintiffs, Clayton and Connelly appeal. cite: 17 Stats, at Large 76; 28 S. C. 532; 81 S. E. 307 and 49 S. C. 1. cite: 49 S. 'C. 4; 81 .S. E. 301; 37 S. C. 77; Code Civil Proc. 123.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gage.

This action involves the right to' fifty acres, o-f land.

It professes, to- be an action for partition; the Circuit Court so held, and ordered partition.

The real defendant, G. B. Clayton, has appealed, and stated nine exceptions, but there are but two' issues, and they of law.

Confessedly, the land formerly belonged to Isaac Chassereau; he conveyed it by deed to his wife, Mary, by a peculiar instrument, which the Circuit Court has. construed; but which deed is not relevant -to. the issues upon which the cause must be decided.

Mary…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Foster v. FosterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  2. Elmore v. DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
  3. Reams v. SpannSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1888

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Walsh v. EvansSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1919
  2. Dent v. BolarSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API