Legal Opinion
Lauri Howe v. Robert Litwack
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 26, 2014No. 13-3380, 13-3448, 13-3449UnpublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROTH, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff Lauri Howe filed a complaint against defendants Robert Litwack; Lit-wack & Kernan, LLC; Gruccio, Pepper, DeSanto & Ruth, P.A. (“Gruccio Pepper”); and Troy Ferus 1 for claims arising under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 et seq., 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the New Jersey RICO statute, and New Jersey state law for breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, abuse of process, civil conspiracy, unjust enrichment, and respondeat superi- or. The District Court dismissed Howe’s suit…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Frederico v. Home DepotCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Philadelphia Entertainment & Development Partners, L.P. v. Pennsylvania Department of Revenue (In re Philadelphia Entertainment & Development Partners, L.P.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- DIRAUF v. BERGERDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- FITTERER v. RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES L.P.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- LI v. ZHANGDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- Scott v. Vantage CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.