Legal Opinion

Scott v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 1, 1926Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Settle

Affirming.

The appellant, Jack Scott, on-his trial under an indictment duly charging the offense,, was by verdict of a jury and the judgment1 of the Hardin circuit court convicted of unlawfully having in his possession, intoxicating liquor and his punishment fixed at confinement of one year in the penitentiary, and by this appeal he seeks the reversal of the judgment of conviction. .. .

It was alleged in the indictment that the offense of which the appellant was thus found guilty was the second committed • by him against the statute- - known as the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Whitaker v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  2. Puckett v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API