Schofield v. Iowa Homestead Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Webster Gweuit Oourt. Action upon tbe covenants of a deed for lands. Trial to tbe court without a jury, and judgment for plaintiff Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
i. Conveyance: covenant of seizin. I. The counsel of the respective parties agree that the action is based upon the covenant of seizin, which is sufficiently expressed in the deed, A . „ x As a defense, the answer alleges that, prior to the commencement of the action, plaintiff, for value, sold and conveyed a part of the lands to another, and that the covenant declared on passed with the land, so far as the contract covered the same, to the purchaser from plaintiff, and that recovery in this action for the land so conveyed is barred. To this defense a demurrer was sustained. The question thus…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kane v. SangerNew York Supreme Court · 1817
- Martin v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1839
- Brady v. SpurckIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
3Cited by15 opinions
- Parmenter v. City of MarionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Kimball v. BryantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- Knadler v. SharpSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
- Clement v. WillettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Woolley v. . NewcombeNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.