Bruner v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DALLY, Commissioner.
The conviction is for felony theft; the punishment, ten years imprisonment.
Appellant contends that the indictment is fatally defective in that it insufficiently describes the property taken as “two suits and being of the total value of over $50.-00,” and that the Court erred in overruling her motion to quash the indictment. Arti-ele 21.09, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., reads in part as follows:
“When it becomes necessary to describe property of any kind in an indictment, a general description of the same by name, kind, quality, number and ownership, if known, shall be…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Knox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Lege v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Davis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
- Wood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Cox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- State v. San Juanita Czaplinski, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
- Tatum v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.