Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Monongahela Railway Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1931No. 6735PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Judge:

Defendant complains of a judgment against it, on verdict, for $11,756.25. The action is for damages to an unimproved lot in the city of Fairmont, caused by the erection by defendant’s predecessor, Buckhannon & Northern Railroad Company, of an overhead bridge or viaduct in front of said property and in the immediate proximity thereof.

The first error assigned pertains to plaintiffs’ instruction No. 6, wherein the jury were told that if they found from the cwidence that the plaintiffs were entitled to a recovery, then “the plaintiffs are entitled to 6% interest per annum upon the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Buckhannon & Northern Railroad v. Great Scott Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Pittsburgh & West Virginia Gas Co. v. Pentress Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Bonafield's HeirsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. McCullough v. ClarkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fort Wayne National Bank v. ScherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. JohnsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. Elk Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
  4. Covina Union High School District v. JobeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Dairy Co-Operative Ass'n v. Brandes CreameryOregon Supreme Court · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API