Legal Opinion
Burnett v. Chimney Sweep, LLC
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 2, 2004No. 2d Civil No. B167190PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
YEGAN, J.
George and Marie Burnett appeal from a judgment on the pleadings in favor of Chimney Sweep, LLC, and Courtland-Dane Management Group, Inc., respondents. They also appeal from postjudgment orders awarding attorney fees to respondents. The action arises from the growth of mold in premises leased by appellants from Chimney Sweep. Courtland-Dane is Chimney Sweep’s property manager.
Appellants contend: (1) respondents’ motions for judgment on the pleadings were untimely; (2) in ruling on the motions, the trial court erroneously considered extrinsic evidence; (3) judgment on the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- People ex rel. Lungren v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Rossmoor Sanitation, Inc. v. Pylon, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
- Cervantez v. J. C. Penney Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Klein v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Daniels v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Sanchez v. City of ModestoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Frittelli, Inc. v. 350 North Canon Drive, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Pointe San Diego Residential Community L.P. v. Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch, LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.