Legal Opinion
Weingarten v. Halfpenny Auto Parts, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 7, 1988PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for, inter alia, malicious prosecution and false imprisonment, the defendants Halfpenny Auto Parts, Inc. and James Halfpenny appeal, as limited by their *374brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Oppido, J.), dated October 22, 1986, as, upon a jury verdict, was in favor of the plaintiff William Weingarten and against them in the principal sum of $140,000.
Ordered that the judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the complaint is dismissed as against these defendants.
A prerequisite…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Burt v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Veras v. Truth Verification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Veras v. Truth Verification Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Rawson v. Francis H. LeggettNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Burt v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wyllie v. District AttorneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Pandolfo v. U.A. Cable Systems of WatertownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Pomento v. City of RomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Jenks v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Stewart v. Fein Such & Crain, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025