Legal Opinion
People v. Grosfeld
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 15, 1983PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The record of the suppression hearing contains no evidence or factual findings supporting the defendant’s contention that the police illegally entered his home to take him into custody. Neither can it be said that the suppression court abused its discretion as a matter of law in denying the defendant’s motion to reopen the hearings following the Supreme Court’s decision in Payton v New York (445 US 573) since the defendant made no allegations of fact or offer of proof demonstrating the relevance of that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- People v. De MauroNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. CharlestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. FriolaNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. KaminskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. De MossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. MercadoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. FarinaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. SellersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.