Legal Opinion
State v. William F.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 13, 2014PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Daniel P. Conviser, J.
The respondent is the subject of a petition for sex offender civil management pursuant to article 10 of the Mental Hygiene Law. He moves here to preclude the State’s expert from reviewing certain records pursuant to the recent decision of the New York Court of Appeals in Matter of State of New York v Floyd Y. (22 NY3d 95 [2013]). That application is opposed by the State and for the reasons outlined below is denied. The respondent also moves to have this court appoint a second expert psychologist or psychiatrist to review the respondent’s condition.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Hambsch v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. SugdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Cassano v. HagstromNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. Angel A.New York Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. J.R.C.New York Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. J.R.C.New York Supreme Court · 2015