Legal Opinion
First Nat. Bank of Ville Platte v. Coreil
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 30, 1933No. 1156PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LE BLANC, Judge.
Whilst- it is not so stated in the order granting a rehearing in this ease, our intention was to limit the same to the two questions raised in the application filed on behalf of First National Bank of Ville Platte, plaintiff and appellant. There was no application for rehearing presented on the part of M. A. Francis Coreil, third opponent and appellee who had suffered a reversal of the judgment appealed from. See (La. App.) 145 So. 395. At any rate, it was stated in open court, when •the case was taken up for argument on rehearing, that our consideration would be limited to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Three Rivers Oil Co. v. LaurenceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
- Lumberman's Bank & Trust Co. v. De Ridder Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Evasovich v. CognevichSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- First Nat. Bank of Ville Platte v. CoreilLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
- Kentwood Bank v. McClendonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
3Cited by2 opinions
- Edwards v. WisemanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
- Hebert v. Hurwitz Mintz Furniture Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1945