PAUL MICKENS v. UNITED STATES
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Senior Judge:
This case presents the following questions: whether the government violated its plea agreement with appellant, and, if so, whether the case should be remanded for resentencing by a different judge, preceded, if appropriate, by permitting appellant to request withdrawal of his plea. Answering these questions substantially in the affirmative, we reverse and remand.
I
On April 1, 2014, Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) officers watched appellant, Paul Mickens, making what they perceived to be several crack cocaine transactions outside of 355 Ridge Road, S.E. Minutes later,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Troy Vaval, AKA Justice VavalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Diaz-JimenezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- White v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.