Legal Opinion

Sobel v. Sobel

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided July 21, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Alimony was fixed and allowed the petitioner in this court on final decree and affirmed by the court of errors and appeals. During the appeal, application was made by petitioner's counsel to the court of errors and appeals for allowance of counsel fee for the services rendered in the appellate court. The customary motion was made by some member of that court to carry the application to conference, and the motion was adopted by the court. When the opinion of that court was delivered and filed, it disposed of the question presented by the appeal but made no mention whatsoever of the application…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ashby v. YetterNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1911
  2. King v. RuckmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1871
  3. Weeks v. ListerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
  4. Putnam v. ClarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1882

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Township of Roxbury v. PlumsteadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API