Legal Opinion

Key Bank USA v. Klein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 27, 1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Moshe Klein appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Meehan, J.), entered March 18, 1996, which denied his motion, inter alia, to vacate a judgment of foreclosure made upon his default in appearing.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court’s determination that the testimony of the process server was credible is entitled to substantial deference on appeal (Federal Natl. Mtge. Assn. v Roth, 240 AD2d 466; Citibank, N. A. v Baronat, 238 AD2d 369; McCray v Petrini, 212 AD2d 676). Based on that testimony…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCray v. PetriniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. RothAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Citibank, N. A. v. BaronatAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Home Federal Savings Bank v. MahoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Demakis v. PapadopoulosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API