McMonigal v. North Kansas City Development Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtShain, P. J.
— This is an action seeking to recover a commission for sale of real estate. Trial was before a jury, resulting in verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $1695.73. Judgment was in accordance with the verdict and defendant duly appealed.
To conform to situation in trial court, we will herein designate respondents as plaintiffs and appellant as defendant.
While the law as to real estate agents’ right to a commission has been well defined by the courts of this State, still the review of the ease at bar is rendered somewhat difficult by reason of a great volume of evidence on matters but collaterally…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Public Utility Com'n of Texas v. Gte-SwCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Theobald v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- Morgan v. KellerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Cameron v. ConnallyTexas Supreme Court · 1927
- Weisels-Gerhardt Real Estate Co. v. Pemberton Investment Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Thorne v. ThorneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
- Switzer v. SwitzerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Brown v. BryanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- Axsom v. ThompsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1946
- Daniels v. DillingerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.