Piggly Wiggly Corp. v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*416OPINION.
Lansdon:
In their stipulation of facts the parties to this dispute have agreed that the petitioner suffered losses of various characters in the aggregate of $2,137,155.84 and that this sum is composed of items which they have classified in three groups, as follows:(a) $201,433.48 represents the so-called misappropriated or embezzled funds not discharged in bankruptcy.(b) $700,216.52 represents the amount that the court held was legally expended by Saunders on marginal accounts for the petitioner, which subsequently became lost.(c) $1,235,505.84 represents the amounts expended by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. S. S. White Dental Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Peterson Linotyping Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
- Stern v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926
- Douglas County Light & Water Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929
- Elliott v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.