Legal Opinion
Enrico's Inc. v. Rice
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 14, 1984No. 83-1689PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
TANG, Circuit Judge:
Appellant, Enrico’s Inc., appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment that held that the Department’s price-posting procedure for wholesale distilled spirits distribution, established under California Business and Professions Code section 24756 and 4 Cal.Admin.Code section 100 (“Rule 100”), did not constitute a per se violation of section 1 of the Sherman Act. Defendants are the California State Department of Alcoholic Beverages (“Department”), certain wine and distilled spirits wholesalers and two wine and distilled spirits wholesale associations. We find…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Enrico's Inc. v. RiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984