Legal Opinion
United States v. Hill
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided October 4, 2001No. CR 00-30041PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MORENO, United States Magistrate Judge.
I
[¶ 1] Defendant, Lamont D. Hill (Hill) was charged by information with contempt of court, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 401 (a Class B misdemeanor). On September 6, 2000, he pled guilty to the contempt charge, pursuant to a plea agreement, and was thereafter sentenced to four months of imprisonment. Hill appealed his judgment and sentence but because the appeal was not taken in a timely manner, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the same for lack of jurisdiction. In the meantime, Hill began serving his sentence and…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nowakowski v. New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- United States v. ArcorenDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2009
- United States v. One StarDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2008
- Jonathan Voorhis v. Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania and District Attorney of Erie CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- Nowakowski v. New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.