Legal Opinion
Doe v. Roe, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 29, 1989Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
David H. Edwards, Jr., J.
In this action brought by plaintiff and charging defendant with violation of the Human Rights Law (HRL) (Executive Law § 296 [1] [a]; § 292 [21]), defendant Roe, Inc. (Roe) moves for an order dismissing the complaint for failure to state a cause of action (CPLR 3211 [a] [7]).
Plaintiff John Doe (pseudonym, as is Roe, Inc.) applied for *157employment as a financial analyst with Roe, a private investment banking firm. As part of the preemployment screening process, plaintiff submitted to a physical examination and urinalysis test. The test revealed the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Rovello v. Orofino Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- CPC International Inc. v. McKessonNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- City of New York v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.