Legal Opinion

Diggs v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided August 19, 1924No. 4 Div. 912PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

The indictment was in Code form and charged a burglary of a dwelling, or shop, store, warehouse, or other building of E. H. Baker, in which goods, merchandise, or clothing, things of value, were kept for sale, use, or deposit. The evidence for the state was that defendant broke and entered a storehouse of B. H. Baker, but there was no evidence that “things of value, were kept for sale, use, or deposit.” The .judgment in this case is reversed, on authority of Gilmore v. State, 99 Ala. 154, 13 South. 536; Porter v. State, 17 Ala. App. 550, 86 South. 143; Ashmon v. State, 9 Ala. App. 29, 63…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gilmore v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  2. Ashmon v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Porter v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Miller v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  3. Harmon v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Spears v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API