Legal Opinion

Emerson v. Steffen

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 20, 1992No. Nos. 91-1837, 91-1840PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff in this class action1 brought suit challenging a certain feature of Minnesota’s Medicaid plan. Plaintiffs only income is $863 a month in social-security disability benefits. A divorce decree requires him to pay $200 a month for the support of his children. Medicaid eligibility depends on what income and resources are “available.” 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(17)(B). Minnesota’s Medicaid plan treats the $200 plaintiff receives, but then must pay in child support, as “available” to him. It must therefore be counted for purposes of determining his Medicaid…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. City of St. Louis v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  3. Emerson v. WyniaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1991

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. LM v. State, Div. of Med. Assist. & Health Serv.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Himes v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  3. Viropharma Incorporated v. HamburgDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  4. Georgia, Department of Medical Assistance ex rel. Toal v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  5. Himes v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API