Legal Opinion

Ray v. Ohio Nat. Life Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 6, 1989No. 87-1205, 87-1259PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal presents two issues:(1) Whether the insurance proceeds payable on the death of Murry Ray must be divided equally between his three surviving children;(2) Whether the trial court erred in refusing to award Ohio National Life Insurance Company attorney fees.

Murry Ray and his wife Barbara Ray were divorced. There were three children of the marriage; Jeffrey, Reena, and Heath Ray. An agreement was made a part of the divorce judgment, and that agreement provided:

"8. The defendant [Murry Ray] shall keep his current $50,000.00 life insurance policy through Alabama Farmers Co-op in full…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Godec v. GodecCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  2. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  3. Ex Parte PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  4. Hardy v. HardyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970
  5. Frawley v. U.S. Steel Min. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ex Parte HardySupreme Court of Alabama · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API