Legal Opinion

Dixon Distributing Co. v. Hanover Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 12, 1993No. 5-92-0071PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lewis

“Judges ought to remember that their office is jus dicere, and not jus dare; to interpret law, and not to make law, or give law.”

This appeal is from a summary judgment entered in favor of the defendants, Hanover Insurance Company (Hanover), Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company (Massachusetts), and International Insurance Company (International), in a declaratory judgment action brought by Dixon Distributing Company (Dixon). For reasons set forth below, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

On October 7, 1985, Patrick Hanneken filed a retaliatory discharge action against Dixon,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Palmateer v. International Harvester Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Wilkin Insulation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Michael Hiatt v. Rockwell International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  2. Dixon Distributing Co. v. Hanover InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Coleman v. East Joliet Fire Protection DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Heldenbrand v. Roadmaster Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  5. Board of Education of Dolton School District 149 v. MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API