Dixon Distributing Co. v. Hanover Insurance
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lewis
“Judges ought to remember that their office is jus dicere, and not jus dare; to interpret law, and not to make law, or give law.”
This appeal is from a summary judgment entered in favor of the defendants, Hanover Insurance Company (Hanover), Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company (Massachusetts), and International Insurance Company (International), in a declaratory judgment action brought by Dixon Distributing Company (Dixon). For reasons set forth below, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
On October 7, 1985, Patrick Hanneken filed a retaliatory discharge action against Dixon,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Palmateer v. International Harvester Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Wilkin Insulation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Michael Hiatt v. Rockwell International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Dixon Distributing Co. v. Hanover InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Coleman v. East Joliet Fire Protection DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 2016
- Heldenbrand v. Roadmaster Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- Board of Education of Dolton School District 149 v. MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.