Panhandle & Santa Fe Railway Company v. Arnold
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Justice.
This suit was brought under the provisions of the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, Title 45, § 51, U.S.Code Annotated. The trial of the cause was conducted under the provisions of the federal law expressed in the act and decisions thereunder and it is recognized that the appeal must be determined by the same law. Bailey v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc., 319 U.S. 350, 63 S.Ct. 1062, 87 L.Ed. 1444; Strickland Transp. Co., Inc., v. Johnston, Tex.Civ. App., 238 S.W.2d 717.
Appellee, H. T. Arnold, while employed as a car inspector by the appellant, Panhandle & Santa Fe Railway…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bailey v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Sproles v. RosenTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- International-Great Northern R. v. LowryTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Aranda v. Texas & N. O. R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Peeler v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McBrideTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Bender v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
- Wehrli v. Wabash Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. SparksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Missouri-Pacific Railroad Company v. PrejeanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.