Legal Opinion
Wakefield v. Colvin
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided May 6, 2016No. 4:15-cv-218 RP-SBJPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROBERT W. PRATT, Judge, United States District Court
On March 16, 2016, the Court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order reversing the Commissioner’s decision with an award of benefits. Clerk’s No. 14. Judgment was entered on March 18, 2016. Clerk’s No. 5. The Commissioner filed a timely Motion to Alter or Amend the Court’s Order on March 22, 2016. Clerk’s No. 16. ■ Plaintiff filed a response on April 5, 2016. Clerk’s No. 17. The matter is fully submitted.
A Rule 59(e) motion is used to correct “manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence.” Innovative Home Health…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Yoshio Oto, of the Estate of Noboru Oto v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Defendant/third-Party v. Ashby Beverley, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Sharon K. COX, Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Loyce McCoy v. Richard S. Schweiker, Clifford M. Stack v. Richard S. Schweiker, James D. Desedare v. Richard S. SchweikerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District v. Mallinckrodt, Inc., Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Baldeo K. Singh v. Kenneth S. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bingham V. Union Pacific Railroad Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2023