Gloria M. v. Frank T.
New York Family Court
1Opinion of the CourtLouis Otten, J.
In this proceeding under the Uniform Support of Dependents Law (Domestic Relations Law, art. 3A), petitioner seeks support of an out-of-wedlock child. Respondent denies paternity. Petitioner has submitted a photocopy of an ‘ ‘ Acknowledgment of Paternity ’ ’ purportedly signed by respondent under date of September 11, 1970 — not a verified statement.
Subdivision 5 of section 33 of the Domestic Relations Law reads: ‘ ‘ The natural parents of a child born out of wedlock *1097shall be severally liable for the support of such child, but the liability of the natural father shall not be enforceable…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Robertson v. CollingsNew York Family Court · 1979
- Martha D. v. Ronald C. D.New York Family Court · 1979