Legal Opinion

In re Li Chiong

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided July 5, 1913Published

Habeas Corpus: Application for writ.

1Opinion of the CourtDole, J.

[la] Upon this application for a writ of habeas corpus, the immigation inspector in charge contested the application on the ground that from the petition itself it appears that it was decided by such immigration inspector that the petitioner did not present a certificate issued by the Chinese government viseed by the diplomatic representative of the United States in China; also that the petitioner did not present a certificate as a merchant viseed by the consular representative of the United States at the port or place from which the person named in the certificate departed; also that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Li ChiongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API