Gregorio Jimenez v. E.R. Myers, Warden Attorney General of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentKozinski, Circuit Judge
As federal judges, we’re subject to a peculiar myopia: We tend to see the federal way of doing things as the best way, often as the be-all and end-all of due process. This preference for the familiar is understandable enough, but it carries with it special dangers when we review state convictions for constitutional error. There are many ways of giving a defendant a fair trial. We sap our federal system of vitality and creativity when we strike down state procedures because they differ from our own.
This is a case in point. Not everyone agrees on how to deal with a jury that indicates it’s…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pulley v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.